In a bold move to confront what many Americans see as an entrenched system of political discrimination, President Donald Trump is preparing to sign a sweeping executive order aimed squarely at the nation’s biggest banks. The order will penalize financial institutions that have denied services to individuals or organizations based on their political or religious beliefs—a practice commonly known as “debanking.”
This isn’t a new fight. The war between major banks and conservative Americans has been quietly raging for over a decade, beginning with the rise of the Tea Party movement in 2012. It was during that time that conservative grassroots groups started noticing something odd: their bank accounts were being shut down, their credit lines frozen, and their applications for financial services denied without clear explanation. Gun manufacturers, pro-life organizations, faith-based nonprofits, and conservative political groups all began reporting sudden and unexplained rejections by their banks. Many suspected these actions were driven not by financial risk, but by political and ideological bias.
Now, in 2025, President Trump is turning the tide.
The new executive order eliminates the use of “reputational risk” as a justification for banks to deny or terminate services. This vague and subjective term has long been cited by institutions like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America to justify distancing themselves from conservative causes or controversial industries such as firearms, fossil fuels, cryptocurrency, or faith-based charities.
Under the new order, federal regulators will be tasked with investigating any past or present cases of politically or religiously motivated debanking. If banks are found to have engaged in such practices, they could face substantial fines or enforcement actions. The Treasury Department will also be directed to work with affected individuals and groups to restore access to financial services and refer any religious-based discrimination to the Department of Justice.
Trump has made it personal. In recent interviews, he revealed that JPMorgan Chase abruptly instructed him to close long-standing accounts, giving him only 20 days’ notice to withdraw his funds. Similarly, Bank of America refused to allow him to deposit over $1 billion, effectively blacklisting him from its services. While the banks deny that their decisions were politically driven, the timing and targets of these actions suggest otherwise.
This type of financial blacklisting is not just a Trump problem. Everyday conservatives—pastors, small business owners, political donors, and right-leaning content creators—have reported similar treatment. Many have quietly been cut off from payment processors, banks, or even GoFundMe pages simply for expressing political views that differ from mainstream narratives.
Trump’s executive order is designed to halt this creeping financial censorship in its tracks. By making it illegal for banks to discriminate based on ideology, he is reinforcing the principle that every American—regardless of political persuasion—has the right to participate in the economy.
The market reacted swiftly. JPMorgan’s stock dropped nearly 1%, making it the worst performer in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, while Bank of America also slid. The financial sector is bracing for what could become a new era of regulatory scrutiny and accountability.
This order sends a clear message: under a Trump administration, politically motivated discrimination in the financial sector will not be tolerated. The same banks that have wielded their power to shape culture and politics behind the scenes are now facing real consequences.
For conservatives who have spent years battling censorship, shadowbanning, and economic exclusion, this move represents more than policy—it’s vindication. And it’s only the beginning.
About the Author
