Michigan Voter Registration Scandal: Israeli Addresses, a Detroit Coffee Shop, and Troubling Election Integrity Questions

Posted by:

Category:

Breaking News, National ... + 1 Politics

Posted on:

August 12, 2025

Screenshot 2025-08-12 at 12.21.32 PM

A major development has surfaced in Michigan’s voter registration system, revealing what could be one of the most bizarre—and potentially alarming—cases of questionable voter entries in recent years.

State voter registration records show that thirteen individuals were added to Michigan’s rolls using mailing addresses in Israel. But here’s the twist: all thirteen registrations are tied to the exact same Detroit coffee shop as their “residential” address.

Unusual Registration Details

The registrations weren’t random. Most listed their gender as “U” (unspecified), with only one identifying as male. All were recorded in the system shortly before the 2024 general election—raising questions about timing and intent. Three of the thirteen actually cast ballots.

Even more suspicious, the official records show that all thirteen were later classified as Permanent Absentee Voters (PAV)—a status that allows ballots to be automatically sent for every election—without any documented re-registration to update their addresses. Normally, if a voter changes a mailing address to an international location, their status would require verification or be flagged for review. In this case, the overseas addresses remained intact.

Coordinated Entries?

Election data analysis shows that the voter applications were not spread out randomly. Instead, they were clustered within just three specific dates, hinting at possible batch entry or coordinated submission. Several of the registrants even share naming patterns, such as similar middle names or slight variations in spelling, suggesting these could have been created or processed in bulk.

The Coffee Shop Connection

On-the-ground visits to the Detroit coffee shop address revealed another oddity: there are no residential apartments upstairs, and the space above is vacant. Yet according to Michigan’s voter roll, all thirteen “residents” claim it as their home.

The coffee shop itself has a history—it was previously operated by a nonprofit that offered community services, including help with obtaining state IDs, birth certificates, and other official documents. While there’s no confirmed link between the nonprofit’s activities and the voter registrations, the overlap in location has fueled speculation about whether it was used as a convenient “anchor address” for questionable voter entries.

Political Fallout

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, who is also running for governor, is now facing renewed scrutiny over the integrity of the state’s voter rolls. Critics say this incident points to systemic vulnerabilities that could allow non-residents—or even non-citizens—to gain voting access.

The fact that these irregular registrations sailed through without detection until after ballots were cast has sparked outrage among election integrity advocates. They argue that Benson’s office should have caught the anomalies immediately, given the combination of foreign mailing addresses, identical residential addresses, clustered registration dates, and bulk status changes to PAV.

Unanswered Questions

Several pressing questions remain:

  • How did voters with Israeli mailing addresses and no apparent Michigan residence gain permanent absentee status?
  • Why were they all linked to the same non-residential Detroit coffee shop?
  • Were these entries processed by a single individual or group?
  • What safeguards failed in Michigan’s voter verification process?

As the controversy builds, calls for a full investigation are growing louder. For Benson, the stakes are high—both politically and legally. With her gubernatorial campaign underway, she’s now battling accusations that her office has failed to protect the integrity of Michigan’s elections.

If proven to be deliberate, this case could become a high-profile example of how vulnerable voter registration systems can be exploited—and why election transparency and accountability remain hot-button issues for voters across the country.


About the Author